Classical Theology

Apologetics

HISTORICAL BIAS, OBJECTIVITY, AND THE TRUTH OF CHRISTIANITY

“Historians are biased and choose what they report. As such, history can’t be known.” That’s a typical objection to the ability to know history. If such objections prove that we can’t know history, then we can’t know that Christianity is true since it is known through history and historical claims. In his prologue, Luke says, […]

HISTORICAL BIAS, OBJECTIVITY, AND THE TRUTH OF CHRISTIANITY Read More »

WHY PHILOSOPHICAL PROOFS FOR GOD ARE BETTER THAN “SCIENTIFIC” PROOFS

Let me first say that I think the “scientific” proofs for God’s existence are very good, as far as they go. (I’ll explain why that word is in quotes later.) Since middle school one of my hobbies has been backyard astronomy. I am very familiar with the intelligent design arguments from cosmology and biology. They

WHY PHILOSOPHICAL PROOFS FOR GOD ARE BETTER THAN “SCIENTIFIC” PROOFS Read More »

THE NEW AGE MOVEMENT AND MIRACLES: A FORMER ASTROLOGER’S INSIGHTS

By Marcia Montenegro, former licensed professional astrologer. CANA/Christian Answers for the New Age: http://www.christiananswersforthenewage.org/ On the other side of a religious view of miracles from God, we can examine the claim of supernatural powers in the New Age and the occult, such as the supposed ability to communicate with the dead, have psychic knowledge, spellcasting, and alleged

THE NEW AGE MOVEMENT AND MIRACLES: A FORMER ASTROLOGER’S INSIGHTS Read More »

PERSUASION VS. DEMONSTRATION: THOUGHTS ABOUT LEE STROBEL’S “THE CASE FOR MIRACLES”

I have several of Lee Strobel’s books. I have greatly enjoyed reading them and was excited to see The Case for Miracles. I have had the great opportunity to briefly meet Lee and I can say he is an incredibly nice person. Further, his new book on miracles is very interesting. Many debates could rage from

PERSUASION VS. DEMONSTRATION: THOUGHTS ABOUT LEE STROBEL’S “THE CASE FOR MIRACLES” Read More »

DEALING WITH THE “WHO CREATED GOD” OBJECTION

It never fails. Offer an argument for God’s existence and almost invariably you will hear, “Well, who created God?” With some arguments this may be a legitimate objection. I have argued elsewhere that philosophical proofs for God’s existence are more powerful than scientific ones. This objection is one instance where I think one can see the advantage

DEALING WITH THE “WHO CREATED GOD” OBJECTION Read More »

FROM WHENCE DOES LOGIC COME? (AND WHY YOU CAN’T USE IT TO PROVE GOD)

There is much talk about logic today. It is obviously used significantly in discussions with philosophers and mathematicians. It has also been a tool of some (particularly presuppositional) apologists to argue for God. They insist that atheists cannot account for logic since it is immaterial and universal. Since logic undeniably exists, then something else immaterial

FROM WHENCE DOES LOGIC COME? (AND WHY YOU CAN’T USE IT TO PROVE GOD) Read More »

Scroll to Top