Classical Theology

Many Christians believe that philosophy is a pagan discipline that is practiced either by ivory tower professors or Starbucks hippies.This belief has led some to object to the relevance of philosophy, as either they believe only a relatively few can do it, or that it deals with such weird and abstract issues that it is a waste of time. Many Christian theologians object that philosophy is rooted in paganism, and thus has no place in Christian theology. After explaining what philosophy is, it should become clear that not only do these objections fail, but philosophy is unavoidable.

‘Philosophy’ literally means “love (phil) of wisdom (sophia).” It is the quest for knowledge, truth, and how to live the good (moral) life. There are several overall branches of philosophy. One, and the most foundational, is metaphysics. Metaphysics is the study of being, or what it means to be real. While biologists study life insofar as things are living, and mathematicians study being as quantified, and physicists study being that is physical or in motion, the metaphysician studies what it means to “be” in general. They ask questions like, what is the difference between Snoopy and a beagle one can take for a walk? Another branch of philosophy is epistemology, which is the study of knowledge. Epistemologists ask questions like, “How can knowledge be attained,” “What is knowledge,” and “Is there a difference between knowledge and belief?” Moral philosophy seeks to know what it means to be good in the moral sense. Where does goodness come from, and what makes something good? Logic studies right reasoning and the mistakes (fallacies) that are sometimes made when trying to make a rational argument. Aesthetics studies the nature of beauty, and asks “What does it mean to be beautiful? Is beauty objective?” And so on.

From these categories there are any number of other philosophical fields. The philosophy of math deals with the nature of numbers, and asks if numbers are real (e.g. does the number 4 actually exist). In other words, it deals with the nature of math. Philosophy of science deals with the nature of science. The philosophy of history deals with the nature of history and historical knowledge. My area is philosophy of religion, which deals with issues like God’s existence, nature, how we talk about him, the problem of evil, and the nature of miracles.

When you say something that purports to be true, you are talking about reality, and are claiming to know something. You are also making a logical claim. Further, you are assuming (explicitly or implicitly) a certain view of how language works (philosophy of language). Even if you are just talking about the tree in your front yard, you are saying something about the tree’s existence and nature. I am not saying that everyone is a “philosopher” in the strict, academic sense. What I am saying, is that it is not possible to make statements about the world, God, or the Bible without taking philosophical positions, regardless of if you are aware of them or not.

The same holds true for theology and biblical studies/interpretation. We cannot make theological claims without using philosophy. For example, when we talk about Jesus taking on a human nature, we must understand what a “nature” is. This is a philosophical category. When a scholar says that biblical interpreters cannot be objective due to their biases, this is a philosophical statement about the nature of objectivity, bias, the knower, and the knowing process.

Far from this being a pagan practice, it is how God made us. He made us rational beings. This is what makes us different from other animals. Philosophy is useful and unavoidable. Instead of trying to avoid it, we should try to become better philosophers, and worship God with our minds.

2 thoughts on “WHAT PHILOSOPHY IS, AND WHY YOU CAN’T AVOID IT”

  1. Janet Lisonbee

    I just found your website. I have listened to a few of your podcasts and have commented under my husband’s name, Dan, since U-tube is under his subscription. Anyway, I am the ex-Mormon who was born again when I was 30 years old, but God didn’t lead me out of the LDS church until after my first husband died and led me to my current 2nd husband [who was also Mormon – we both born and raised in that religion and of pioneer ancestral stock]. We both are navigating the Christian community and it is difficult, especially from coming from the “one true church” mentality. I am an earnest seeker of truth. You are right. We can’t avoid philosophy.

    I would LOVE for you to do a series on the Trinity. As you know, the Mormons believe God the Father has a physical body. I have discarded that idea. I truly believe Jesus is God manifest in the flesh. Christ is the intermediary between mortals and God. Did Stephen, just before he died of stoning, really see the Father, along with Christ? How did mortals hear the voice of God declaring the sonship of Christ? Of course, the creator of physical entities, can communicate, using physical attributes, so I guess it isn’t a problem for God:) I do know that He is truth, love, light, eternal and all knowing, all powerful, and in all and all.

    We need Christ, not only for salvation, but for relation….we can relate to Him because He is physical. However, I truly struggle with understanding Christ’s infinity. Doesn’t a son come after the Father, even in the spiritual realm?

    The Holy Spirit is also difficult for me to understand. For the longest time, I felt that the Holy Spirit is God the Father’s Spirit, emanating truth, comfort, guidance, convictions, etc. to the heart of receptive mortals – not a separate entity.

    Modalism was sort of attractive to me because I could wrap my brain around an eternal God, who has an avatar in Christ, and emanates His Spirit into our hearts. I disagreed with the idea that He took on one form at a time, very quickly. It is easier to believe that He can be all three forms at once. Hence, three in one. However, the scriptures really does divide the Godhead into 3 parts. So, I would be very interested in your thoughts on the Trinity!!

  2. I found this article very interesting and engaging! Unfortunately, I did not study philosophy in school, and now that I am an adult, I have grown passionate about this vast and wonderful world. I want to make up for lost time by reading as much as I can, and I am glad I discovered this blog. Thank you and congratulations on the site.

Leave a Reply to Soul Philosophy Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top